Yamaha RX-V2092 A/V Receivers
Yamaha RX-V2092 A/V Receivers
[Jan 14, 1999]
John Boullie
an Audiophile
Love the Yamaha RX-V2092 and have had it for about a year. I am planning to upgrade it to a new Yamaha RX-V2095 mainly because the 2092 only has one optical digital input and two RF digital input. |
[Jan 17, 1999]
SBD
a Casual Listener
Well, I've just purchased the RX-V2092, after testing many diffrantreciever's and i got to tell you - this one is the best that I've herd. |
[May 27, 1999]
Athir
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently purchased this unit. So far, it's great. The DD decoding is fantastic and there's power to spare. |
[Jun 28, 1999]
Aaron Rehm
a Casual Listener
I just picked up my 2092 for $850 and am VERY impressed. I am upgrading from a Sony STR-DE715 (POS) and am blown away. I am using a bastard setup due to insufficient funds for a full set of new speakers. I have JBL 4410 Studio Monitors up front (VERY nice for the price), some JBL's for the centers, Bose 301's for the rears, and a Panasonic A120 DVD. First thing I tried is Ch 2 from Armageddon (where NYC gets blown to hell) YEEEHAA!!!!! Could not believe how good AC3 sounds. Seems like this reviever really lets the bass out, even 2ch music has a bottom end to it i never knew existed. A friend and I compared his Yamaha A1000+ some Polks to my set up using "Yello - The Race" That song rocks for demoing setups (lots of distinct left and right sounds, bass and highs, you get the point) I am no longer envious of his system. It still rocks, but now mine rocks as well. The 2092 has plenty of power (I've never gotten the dial past straight up), the remote was not as bad as I thought it would be, and will last a long time for me. |
[Nov 10, 1999]
Anthony Liew
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent
Weakness:
NIL it's a good buy, and will sure not regret Similar Products Used: Nil |
[Nov 16, 1999]
mcclain
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
plenty of power, equal amp distribution
Weakness:
complicated remote despite being a couple years old this is a great unit. plenty of power and it sounds good with my psb's i also run a hughes platinum digitalsat through it and the DD sound it awesome! you should be able to find this unit for around 800 bones |
[Dec 25, 1999]
Tom W
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lost of clean power, plenty of outputs, digital surround modes.
Weakness:
The door to the controls/bass/treble. About 2 years ago, i decided to go DD & upgrade from my "piece of crap" Pioneer reciever i had. After hearing the 2092 i knew it was what i wanted. I had read that Yamaha's surround modes sounded the most real. With the write source,(music video/concert,taped in a stadium or good venue,)"the sound can be amazingly real". As for power i find it has more than enough, with 150wpc/stereo,5x100wpc +25wpc DD/PL. I have the reviews for both the 2092 & DSP-A1 & there power bench tests were nearly identical. (Stereo Review 10/97, Output at clipping (2092, 10 seconds all 5 channels 116 watts, Stereo Review 6/98, DSP-A1, 116 watts). I'm not saying the DSP-A1 is'nt a good reciever, i just think they could have put "a little more power" into it for the hefty price. And at the time there was not even a single DTS DVD out yet & besides i am happy with DD. When i start to see as many DTS DVD's as DD, then maybe i'll upgrade. Back then i had 2 pairs of Bose Interaudio series, Model 4000 as my mains, each with a 10" woofer & 3" tweeter,Klipsch 1.5's & KV3 cc,with Definitive BP2's for front effects & a Sunfire sub & my friend said it sounded "Better THAN ANY Movie Theatre". I have since sold the Bose (i got about 8 good years out of them & they sound "a lot better than any Bose Life-styles cubes")& upgraded my mains to Klipsch 10.5's & could not be happier. I also bought a pair of demo 2.5's which i am now using as surrounds along with the 1.5's. A couple of salesman said i had to use the speaker outputs or a seperate amp for two pairs of speakers, "NOT". I am using the rs speaker outputs for the 2.5's & a seperate amp for the 1.5's. I have added another Sunfire sub since then & would realy like to get another pair of 1.5's for the front effects as having matching or similar speakers can make a difference. I realize i've been saying more about my system than the actual reciever, so in closing i just want to say "hats off to Yamaha",a great value for the money & i am totally satisfied with my 2092 & have never had any problems,& i can play music pretty loud some times. The "only thing" i dont like about it is the door on the front to the tone controls. The 3090,DSP-A1,have balance push at the bottom doors,the 2092 has to be pulled opened at the sides,which is real pain in a narrow cabinet, but i can live with that. |
[May 30, 1997]
Vince DiNapoli
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently upgraded from a yamaha rx-v990 to the rx-v2092. The 990 was noslouch however, the 2092 is a major league receiver ! The 2092 comes 100 |
[May 30, 1997]
Vince DiNapoli
an Audio Enthusiast
I recently upgraded from a yamaha rx-v990 to the rx-v2092. The 990 was noslouch however, the 2092 is a major league receiver ! The 2092 comes 100 |
[Mar 18, 2001]
Rick
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
I love the true power. More than enough power to power my parties.
Weakness:
I don't like the remote. It it is very confusing and a little over whelming. It was a lot of money, but worth every penny. No regrets here! Similar Products Used: Onkyo |