Yamaha RX-V795 A/V Receivers
Yamaha RX-V795 A/V Receivers
[Dec 05, 1998]
Matt Anderson
an Audio Enthusiast
I just set this up about a week ago when I bought my new HT system and I am very impressed with the overall design, features and power of this unit. It is great for music as well as home theater. It is really not that hard to use, just read all of the manual to get all the benefits it has. Very nice but I paid full retail($799.00) because I bought it along with my entire system from my hi-fi store. It should be worth it in the long run. Five stars for performance though it is a little expensive. |
[Dec 06, 1998]
Mel
an Audio Enthusiast
I just upgraded from a Yamaha RX-V490 DPL receiver to the Yamaha RX-V795.The 795 is a great value with excellent performance. The lack of sufficient S-Video's is a minus, but not a big deal to me. It's easy to etup/use/navigate, and the on screen display is nice. The digital signal autodetection is cool -- it automatically flips between Dolby Digital, dts, PCM, and analog inputs nstantaneously. The 795 remembers which audio program (DD, dts, DPL, DSP mode) was used last for each input device so there's no need to switch DSPs yourself. It also stays with your last video source if you choose an audio only input (great for listening to the tuner while you're skipping commercials on your VCR :-)) |
[Dec 05, 1998]
Brad Hendrickson
an Audio Enthusiast
I just had a quick thing to bring up... I noticed a lot of people liked the receiver, of which I am one. But complained about reading the dial on the remote in the dark. I figured out the simplest way was to hold down the DSP button on the remote and the red light up at the top illuminates the dial so you can see what you are dialing in. |
[Dec 07, 1998]
Dale
an Audio Enthusiast
I have heard that Uncle's has tried to sell returned merchandise as new. It is a gamble. You might get the best deal of your life and be very happy or you might get stuck with crap. Your call. I am not going to say Uncle's is bad but i have just heard stuff. |
[Dec 23, 1998]
anon
a Casual Listener
What's the difference between DTS and AC-3? I am thinking about buying 2092, but it's a little pricey for me. I am just a poor college kid. My friend suggested this model. Considering the difference in prices, which one would you guys recommend? Thanx a lot. |
[Dec 31, 1998]
T
an Audio Enthusiast
This is a great Yamaha receiver with DTS. It is very clean, powerful and has many sound fields. I do have several issues. The lack of S-Video ports for DVD and the cheap speaker connectors for the center and surround speakers. |
[Dec 26, 1998]
civic
a Casual Listener
This is my first receiver. It easy to use and sound is great. |
[Jan 04, 1999]
John Ortenberg
an Audio Enthusiast
Just got the 795 @ PC RICHARDS for $599. A bit of haggeling worked wonders. Great piece of hardware. I have it hooked up to a Toshiba 2108 DVD, Design Accoustic Front, Tannoy center and Infinity rear. Sounds fantastic for the price. |
[Jan 12, 1999]
PriceW
a Casual Listener
The less expensive of the Yamaha receivers with both DTS/DD. You can tellwhere Yamaha has cut corner on. The cumbersome rotary dial on the remote and |
[Jan 01, 1999]
Jerry C.
an Audiophile
I have reviewed a number of receivers over the past couple months and even taken the Yamaha 795, the Rotel receiver, and a Nakamichi receiver home for extended demos. I have not purchased yet, but the Yamaha 795 or 995 are leading candidates. I believe that the Yamahas have excellent sound or "natural sound" with most music types and the majority of speakers. The extra definition provided by Yamaha is great and realistic with classical music and all vocals. It is very good with jazz although I believe the Nakamichi extended the bass further very slightly and that might be preferable for jazz instrumentals. The NAD sound had very good bass but seemed muddy and without definition. I did a 2-hour A-B-C test between the Yamaha, Nakamichi, and NAD - blind without knowing which was which. The Rotel and the Denon receivers were very similar in sound: very sweet and rich and somewhat rounded off. While this may not be quite accurate, the Rotel sounded the best with brassy horns. The 1 Rotel, 2 Denons, and the NAD all sounded better with "bright" speakers than the Yamaha. The Yamahas appear to be most realistic but "bright" speakers may make them sound harsh. While the Yamahas and perhaps the Nakamichi work best with most of my music (classical & jazz) and my speakers (warm & rich, but needing extra clarity), this may not be true for the music and equipment of others. The Sherwood Newcastle receivers also sounded very close to the Nakamichi and are a very good value,however I hate their ergonomics. I also disliked the speaker connections and the too-few S-VHS inputs on the Yamaha 795, but this is balanced by the DTS and 5.1 inputs that Yamaha has and Denon doesn't have. The Yamaha 995 seems to solve these minor problems and throws in a larger power supply also. It is unfortunate that so many "fans" of a certain piece of audio equipment rate their favorites as 5 stars. This implies that they are perfect and there are none better. I would rate the Yamaha 995, Yamaha 795, Nakamichi AV10, and Rotel 965 all as 4 stars. I would rate the Denon 2700 & 3200 & Pioneer Elite receivers as 3-1/2 stars and the NAD and Sherwood Newcastles as 3 stars. |