Sennheiser HD 600 Over-Ear
Sennheiser HD 600 Over-Ear
[Mar 10, 2002]
ashok522
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Everything-Very comfortable, high quality etc etc..
Weakness:
None---Some people question the integrity of the cables, but i have never had any problem with these, or the HD580''''s.. The bottom line is as follows: If anyone is in the market for a pair of Full-Size Headphones, buy the Senn HD600 on ebay.. There are 2 main vendors selling it new for about $215 brand new--It is basically a great price for these cans. I wanted to wait a month before writing a review on this item so I can let the headphones break in and I have a good idea of how they compare to my Sony MDR-V6 and my Sennheiser HD580. The Sony MDR-V6 of course is in a different class so there is really no comparison. The HD600 hands down is superior...Not to say MDR-V6 is a bad headphone--quite the opposite, I think for the price i don''''t there is any others that could compare as far as quality of sound or build...anyway this review is not about the sony...so i will provide a comparison between the HD600 and HD580 One thing, is that I do not use a headphone amp like many of the people here. I do however have a high quality pre-amp with a good headphone out (Sony TA-E9000ES). I personally don''''t understand why anyone would want to raise the volume that high on headphones anyway, as it is damaging to the ears. Since I bought them, I have mostly been using them on my computer though..connected to the headphone out on my sony m81 monitor, and surprisingly they saw absolutely awesome even on the computer..I don''''t know why -- it just does. I thought that I would only be able to get good sound off my TA-E9000ES or i would have to get an amp..but it was a really welcome surprise that is sounds great connected to the computer monitor! I have listened to many many headphones in the past and I wasnt really expecting a miraculous sound difference...but the sound out of these is really awesome dont know how to describe it. The sound is very well defined. The Sennheiser HD580''''s have a warmer sound to them, the HD600''''s have cleaner bass, mid and highs...I wasnt expecting to notice any difference since the specs are EXACTLY the same between the two, so i was quite happy... The build quality of these headphones seems very good, and better than the HD580--A nice box is included in the package.... Comfort---The first week the headphones were a bit tight around the head but after that they became very comfortable.. HD580 versus HD600 ---> The HD600 have very noticeably cleaner sound, which was surprising. Similar Products Used: Senn HD580, Sony MDR-V6 |
[Mar 08, 2002]
berty_sol
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
you''ll just have to listen to find out.
Weakness:
cheap cable ??? There''s are term in computer programming called GIGO.This term totally refers to these headphones.It sounds like heaven with pricey equipment.On my minidisc player, on my portable CD player, on my pc sound card it sounds awfull. On my pricey equipment it shines, plenty of bass(if its on there on your source equipment), pure midrange and sweet treble.If you have cheap equipment then forget these phones. Garbage in, garbage out. Similar Products Used: grado rs1, vivanco, sony cd1700 (great phones), senn hd580 |
[Mar 07, 2002]
James Leadbetter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
they feel divine to wear. You forget they are on, but most importantly is their ability. The bass from these cans simply cannot be described, and they go loud if needed, but can also be more subtle than you would think possible.
Weakness:
none. Speakers of the world, be very affraid! Ok, im a student. I do music as a hobby, both listening and recording. Over the course of around 5 years I haved gone through more than 6 or 7 pairs of enclosed cans. The sound always lacked something that a good set of speakers could only manage. I discovered these at a clearance of 99 pounds down from 250. I scraped, and bought, and have hardly used my speakers since. And why have I given these cans 5 stars for value at such a price? Because I will never part with them, and I can no longer use anything else. They are worth every student penny of mine. Similar Products Used: Philips, Koss, Pioneer, Panasonic, Wharfdale, Sony |
[Mar 03, 2000]
Dennis
Audiophile
Strength:
Incredible "electrostatic like" sound
Weakness:
NONE! Coupled these with the Musical Fidelity "X-Cans", and you're in for rare sonic treat. Similar Products Used: AKG K240, Audio-Technica ATH-7 (electret condenser, Sony M400 |
[Oct 10, 2001]
Fred O'Neal
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Nice rounded sound does not lack in any musical range
Weakness:
MUST use a headphone amp,Cheesy cables I am an avid headphone listener and own lots of headphones and headphone amps.These phones are the best for at home use.They simply have the best sound of any conventional(non electrostatic)headphone I have ever head.The only real problem I see with these phones is the absolute need to use a GOOD headphone amp.If you are not using a headphone amp you are not getting the best sound from these headphones.I have found that they sound best when used with the MG head or the Xcans,both tube amps.They sound pretty good with the Creek as well but the Grado has to turned up to nearly max volume to extract decent sound quality.Why the cheap cable on a $450.00(retail)set of headphones?That is ridiculous.That cable is guaranteed to fail at some point which is a real shame.I have found these headphones to sound best listening to jazz and vocal recordings.There is intimate detail in every recording that was previously unrevealed.It brings this detail out without revealing the weakness of the recording,which is the problem with the Grados.Is there such a thing as being too revealing?In the case of the Grados I think so.Buy these Phones ,use with a good headphone amp and enjoy your whole music collection all over again. Similar Products Used: Grado sr 80 Grado sr 325 AKG 501 AKG 401.Grado Ra1 headphone amp.Creek obh-11 headphone amp.Musical fidelity Xcans V2 headphone amp.Antique soundlabs MG head DT phone amp. |
[May 20, 2000]
P.B. Foote
Audiophile
Strength:
Natural, detailed
Weakness:
none Like the previous reviewer, I too was not impressed with these cans initially. In fact, I kept my shipping material handy so I could return them during my first 3 weeks of listening. Similar Products Used: HD 465 |
[Mar 31, 2000]
Samir
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very musical, no listening fatigue. Outstanding.
Weakness:
None ThHD 600 deserves the bestsources and headphone amp you can afford! I use the NVA HP10, with Wireworld Equinox cable with WBT connectors, see www.uhfmag.com). Similar Products Used: HD 580 |
[Dec 09, 2000]
Douglas Gelowitz
Audiophile
Strength:
Open-Air Design
Weakness:
Cost I purchased these headphones after reading the outstanding review in Stereophile, which rates them as a Class A component. I did not audition the HD600 headphones prior to purchasing them because I have used Sennheiser HD580 headphones at the Yale Music Library fed directly into a Marantz CD-67 SE CD player, which I found to be an excellent sounding combination. I believed the HD600s would probably sound slightly better than the HD580, but certainly not worse. Similar Products Used: Sennheiser HD580 |
[Oct 22, 2000]
Travis Holt
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Awsome sound, long cord, soft earcups
Weakness:
a little heavy Love these things. was very pleased wtih the 565's. I didn't think I would hear a difference between these two headphones, but wow. I listen to mostly electronica and some vocal, these are incredible. I'm using a headroom home amp. Similar Products Used: Sennheiser 565, various Sony mdr-xxx |
[Aug 29, 2000]
Brian
Audiophile
I can't add any more to what has been said except to say that with these headphones, I think I have now become an "audiophile". I have been listening to a pair of Sennheiser HD 540 reference II headphones through a Headroom Supreme amp for about 4 years or so, and thought they sounded pretty sweet. The HD 600s immediately improved upon this (without break-in), and after two weeks of listening to them, I went back to the HD 540s and OUCH! They sounded awful! |