Mission 701 Floorstanding Speakers
Mission 701 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jul 30, 1999]
Bret
a Casual Listener
These retail for $189 each, I got them for $125 each as floor models. No big deal, cuz they need to be broken in anyways... I found it very hard to find legit mail order sources for mission. The official company policy is that mail order is not allowed. Circuit City and Good Guys are carrying the little Polk RT25 for the same price, so I didn't do so bad. I'm using these for home theater and general music. There are better speakers for classical, and better speakers for rock/rap. But I feel that they are very smooth, accurate, and "tight", which makes them good enough for my music needs, and great for home theatre. I'm running a sub already, so I didn't see any need to go bigger than these 701s. They are essentially flat to less than 80hz (my crossover point), and the benefit of being smaller is less boomy midbass, and less "chesty" vocals. LArger cabinets will resonate much more as well. Volume-wise, they can hurt my ears and remain very clean with my 80x5 Sony eS reciever. Since the tweeter is at the bottom of the cabinet, you'll need taller stand than you might think in order to get good highs/imaging...-the off-axis response of the tweeter isn't so great, but my approach to home theater was to go with more directional speakers as they do in M&K's highly acclaimed THX set-up. You should also check out KefQ15, Paradigm mini, energyexl15, NHT superones at similar prices, especially the Kefs. I almost got them, but was afraid of the really low impedence hole at high frequencies (unless you've got a good 4ohm amp) |
[Jan 15, 2002]
Rick B
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clear across the range. Good mids in particular.
Weakness:
None for the money I bought these to go with my Quad 33/303 system. The Quad delivers great mid-range and highs, with slighly lower but warmer emhasis on the bass. This is the 'old fashioned' sound that later 60's and early 70's amps have. The mission speakers are just what I've been looking for, they extend the bass that little bit without sounding to agressive and compromising the Quad's 'warmth'. |
[Aug 17, 1999]
Richard Anderson
an Audio Enthusiast
Have been using the mission for 6 months now. Find it to offer lots of sound for the money but treble gets too aggresive at times. Good for dance and rock maybe but not classical as treble too upfront and gets bright at times and theres a slight hint of coloration. |
[Aug 07, 2001]
Sam Patel
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Amazing Bass, Nice sweet treble, look good
Weakness:
Mid-range needs improving, but at lower levels works better Im Using an old Technics AMP and these baby's thump. nice bass, good for hip-hop as small woofer is more responsive giving quicker bass even at higher levels. i bought them without hearing, the mission nbame tempted me and im not regreting them. Similar Products Used: Mission 702's, |
[Jul 08, 2001]
Steven
Casual Listener
Strength:
Bass, looks, price, warranty (5 years)
Weakness:
Build quality (see below) I'm no audiophile, but, I love these speakers. I don't notice what others describe as lots of bas at low volumes. Admittedly, the bass on these speakers jumps rapidly when I turn up the bass on my receiver -- Kenwood VR-307. |
[Jul 05, 2001]
Ashok Madhavan
Audiophile
Strength:
Bass,mids and driver position
Weakness:
A bit boxy mid range The stock speaker is great value for money. Compared to the Dynaudio Audience 50 the mid range sounds boxy. A good stand is essenial an I use sand filled stands that bring the bass driver to ear height when I am seated. In most musical arrangements note that the HF comes from a point lower than the singer and some other instruments and so the tweeter below the bass driver kind of duplicates that. Similar Products Used: Rogers GS1,Dynaudio Audience 50 and 60 |
[Dec 18, 2000]
Tommy
Audiophile
Strength:
Many .... Bass (for size), midrange clarity, smooth treble.
Weakness:
Not bi-wireable. Missions are traditionally "proper", especially their stand mount offerings. The 701's break that tradition somewhat. Or, perhaps I should say that the 701's would appeal more to those who don't necessarily want "proper". Similar Products Used: Kef, Paradigm, NHT, Mission, ESS ....... |
[Sep 11, 2000]
Marco Morelli
Audiophile
Strength:
Clear, great sound stage, unbeliveable mids and highs. Very strong (not boomy) clear bass.
Weakness:
none... might say box is a little big. they are about 17.5in x 8.5in x 12.5in. (HxWxD) but it's worth it, and it's not that big. no bi-wire. First of all I would like to start off saying I paid $39 each for these. I got a great deal from Ubid. The total with shipping to my door was $130 (shipping was around $50) It was well worth paying the shipping for the price I got them at. Similar Products Used: tested almost every speaker in it's price range, spent about 100 hours shopping and reading reviews. |
[May 19, 2000]
Shaun O'Neil
Audiophile
Strength:
Good bass, Exellent mids, Articulate highs.. Overall this is a very strong speaker..
Weakness:
Some dance and rap the bass becomes too great at high levels.. I need a sub though.. Highs can be piercing at Extreme levels. I love my speakers. I got them on a good deal so it turned out well.. I run them on a Luxman A215 intergrated amp 50w/Channel RMS.. These puppies handle it pretty well. Keeping in mind that it doesn't take much to make them bellow out the tunes.. I want more missions.. I intend to get a high wattage audiophile surround amp and use thes as rear channels and get some bigger missions with a mission center channel and sub... Go to the store and listen to them.. Worth every penny.. BUT if you can afford it buy a pair of magnapan magnaplanars or martin logans.. That is high fi stuff... email me if you have any questions Similar Products Used: JVC mini system. HECO 4ohm. My Fathers Magnapan Magnaplanar 2.0 Loudspeakers (KICKS ALL SPEAKERS A**) |
[May 22, 2000]
Louie Kiing
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Tight and control Bass, Speed and Sweet Midrange
Weakness:
No Bi-amping support, no gold plated speaker jack I returned both AE2 and KEF after 2 weeks when I ready don't appriciate their bass though both define the excellent mid-high. Just Hooking up 701 with Marantz PM-19 Link with VDH CS122 Cable (with Rotel RCD951 VDH interconnect). This system gives a fast and tight bass. And everything seem to be change when playing Nicolus Gunn-Return to Grand Canyon comparing my previous speakers. 701 bass is well extended. Switching to Karajan 1412, my folks said, this is 'music' and it realy goes airly. Though It produces slighly inflat canon sound at the end of the track but I know this is due to old recording. The string is very smooth and well position, and it places the orchestra just right in front of you steadyly and not swinging around. However, just hate that the system comes with single input which does not suppot bi-amping/wiring. also the input contact is not gold plated.. look cheap and the x-over also comes with fewer components. Anyone out there has better idea on how to impro ve this... Similar Products Used: AE Angis 2, KEF Cresta 2, ProAct 2000 |