Thiel CS2.3 Floorstanding Speakers
Thiel CS2.3 Floorstanding Speakers
[Sep 02, 1999]
Nobuaki Takeuchi
an Audiophile
Hi, my name is Nobuaki and I'm from Japan.It's been almost half an year since my CS2.3s came. |
[Feb 12, 1999]
Leonard
an Audiophile
I really do not like debates over which speakers to get as it is, in my humble opinion, the most subjective component of all audio equipments. I know that there are a few out there who couldn't live with Thiels, but as for me, I'd live and die by them. And the 2.3 is definately no exception. Incredible imaging and musical accruacy, awesome soundstaging and unfatigueing clear, delineated dyanmics ... well, you know the whole spew. And in my expereince, none of the praise is over exaggerated. The first time I heard a Thiel (CS3.6), I fell in love with the speaker. With the CS2.3s, Jim Thiels has proven once again proven to me that he is and will continue to make top notch speakers. 5 stars. Anything less and I wouldn't own it. |
[Feb 27, 1999]
John
an Audio Enthusiast
I wish I could could afford to buy these units, an audiophile friend of mine let me spend an evening with his system after a recent upgrade (to Thiel 2.3 from some older B&W units). |
[Oct 09, 1999]
Michael Janocik
Audiophile
Last year I purchased the Theil cs2.3's to replace my Definitive Audio BP10's. I kept an MK powered subwoofer. When I brought the Thiels home, played a few cuts including "Flight of the Cosmic Hippo" by Bela Fleck and the Flecktones, I quickly called my brother (to whom I had sold the BP10 speakers) and offered him my subwoofer to go with his new bp10's. Before the Thiels were even broken in, I knew that I would not need the subwoofer. Plenty of good, tight, deep bass. Fantastic speakers. |
[May 09, 2001]
Henry
Audiophile
Strength:
Imaging, Clarity, Timbre, Assembly Quality
Weakness:
Unforgiving of substandard upstream components, requires plenty of current to sing John must simply be joking, or a total fool. Anyone driving these virtuosos with a Sherwood receiver and CD changer needs their head examined and then removed. Too bad John can't find some Mach 1s and zip cord from Radio Shack, and a case of Keystone Light - his perfect system. Back to the review. Properly powered and fed a quality source, the 2.3s rival electrostatics in their total clarity and staging. Near perfect timbre and balance. They offer tight and strong bass and fine dynamics, too. The trick with speakers of this pedigree is plenty of quality current - at least 150 wpc from the likes of Classe or ML. If you can afford tubes all the way through, these can be magical. Look for models with the improved coaxial driver assembly - these models are smoother sounding than earlier 2.3s. They're ruthlessly revealing of inferior upstream components, which might explain John's moronic rant. However, they'll extract all there is from better gear. Similar Products Used: Sonic Frontiers, CEC, Tara Labs |
[Apr 26, 2001]
John
Audiophile
Strength:
Make good doorstop
Weakness:
Cost and quality My local dealer let me borrow a pair of these for an in-home trial. I hooked these $3,000 babies to my 5-year old, but very reliable Sherwood receiver. Put in a couple heavy metal CDs in my Sherwood CD changer and hit play. Immediately, I noticed that the max volume level was greatly reduced compared to my Pioneer speakers. The bass output was a joke compared to what I'm used to. Even after I turned up the bass to max and pushed the speakers against the back wall, the bass was still very lacking. There was no boomyness. I took them back to my local dealer and asked him for some other speakers to try. He said that he didn't have anything for me. Can you believe that? He said that I should go to his competitor and ask him to try out some Revel speakers. So look for my review on the Revel's soon. Similar Products Used: Cerwin Vega, Pioneer, Sherwood |
[Jan 06, 2001]
JOE
Audiophile
Strength:
EXCELLENT THIEL DEALER ADVISE AND RESPONSE. THE LOCAL DEALER INSTALLED THE NEWLY UPDATED MID-UPPER RANGE DRIVER INTO MY 2.3s. I HAD BOUGHT MY 2.3s USED.
Weakness:
MY 2.3s WERE SUFFERING FROM HARSHNESS IN THE UPPER MID RANGE THUS PRODUCING ALMOST UNLISTENABLE SOUND IN THAT RANGE. IF YOU READ MY PREVIOWS REVIEW OF 12/5/99, YOU MUST HAVE HAD SECONDS THOUGHTS IF YOU WERE ABOUT TO ENDEAVOUR INTO THE THIEL REIGN THROUGH THE 2.3s, BUT THANKS TO THE LOCAL THIEL DEALER, ABSOLUTE AUDIO IN PONCE, PR, AS WELL AS MIKE AT JS AUDIO, MY 2.3s ARE ABOUT THE SMOOTHEST, CLEANEST, DETAILED AND JUST SWEET SOUNDING SPEAKERS AROUND. I REPLACED THE DRIVERS WITH THE NEWLY UPGRADED (BY THIEL) MID-UPPER DRIVER THAT HAS PRACTICALLY DONE AWAY WITH THE HARSHNESS THAT HAD ME READY TO RETIRE THEM INTO THE BASEMENT. THE NEW DRIVERS HAVE SMOOTHED THE SOUND TO A SILKY AND PLEASANT DELIVERY OF THE VIOLIN UPPER RANGE AND HAS RETURNED THE THRILL TO MY LISTENING ROOM. THE SPEAKERS ARE NOW SLIGHTLY LAID BACK BUT JUST ENOUGH NOT TO LOSE THEIR EXCELLENT RESPONSE AND CHARACTERISTICS. Similar Products Used: THIEL 2 2, B&W MATRIX, AR303 |
[Jan 04, 2001]
Jon Oda
Audiophile
Strength:
Holographic imaging,excellent taut and clean mid bass, beautiful male and female voices, beautiful maple finish
Weakness:
Slightly bright, deep bass foundation limited, first order cross over requires more careful setup When I purchased the Thiel 2.3's, I also seriously auditioned the Hales Revelation 3, Aerial Acoustics 10T and 8B, Dunlavy SC-III, Legacy Classic, Martin Logan SL 3, Quad ESL-63, PSB Stratus Silver, Von Schweikert VR-4, B&W 801 Matrix. Similar Products Used: Energy C-4 (3 years), Paradigm Studio 20 (1 year), Rogers LS-7 (15 years), Accoustat Spectra 22 (10 years), Boston Acoustics A400, Boston Acoustics A40, Polk 7B, many brands auditioned at stores and at friends |
[Jan 04, 2001]
Frank Poiesz
Audiophile
Strength:
Full-range clarity, astounding transparency, open, well-defined soundstage, wonderful spiking system
Weakness:
None found yet, at least compared with other products that cost less than 10K OK, I was considering a sub for my PSB's, which I really enjoyed. After listening to velodyne, a few of Carver's cubes and kicking out anything much larger, I wasn't happy with the cost of getting a little bass extension...integration problems and cabling woes. Then Marvin at AudioLab told me to listen to the Thiels. I didn't plan to spend this much, but, wow. Not to be swayed by listening room sessions alone, I did the review and shopping thing. What's not to love in a reputation for ruthless transparency? I listened to the Dynaudio 1.8's on recommendation from another dealer and also did a brief look at the much more pricey Vandersteen model 5 (which had some serious set-up problems at the time, so I can't say they were properly auditioned). Similar Products Used: PSB Stratus Silvers, Vandersteen 3ce, Morel 202a, DCM Time window (1978 vintage) |
[Jan 01, 2001]
ed
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clarity from top to bottom,deep soundstage, solid construction
Weakness:
need lots of clean current, after a long search for speakers, I am glad I finally bought the thiels. Similar Products Used: aerial acoustics, dynaudio contour 3.0, wilson cubs |